LAB / WMSI-EXP-049

Sim-to-Real Policy Testing.

How robustly do simple learned policies transfer from simulation to a low-cost physical robot?

STATUS / PROTOCOL DRAFTPRIORITY / P2 — Later / expensiveREGISTRY / 26 SEP 2026 · V1.0

01 / QUESTION

Robotics and Embodied AI

How robustly do simple learned policies transfer from simulation to a low-cost physical robot?

PLANNED RESEARCH

This is a protocol scaffold, not a completed experiment or a frozen execution plan. No measured effect or research conclusion is claimed here.

Hypothesis to test

The manipulation described below produces a reproducible, condition-specific change in the measured system behavior or internal state that is not explained by the ordinary controls.

Ordinary competing explanation

The observed pattern is explained by ordinary sampling variation, prompt/representation artifacts, surface lexical cues, evaluator bias, or the known product/runtime mechanics captured by the controls.

02 / PLANNED DESIGN

How we intend to test it

Train in simulation, deploy in controlled physical tasks, and quantify transfer gaps.

Controls

Multiple simulators/domain randomization; scripted baseline.

What we would measure

Success, trajectory error, interventions, safety stops.

Access and instruments

Physical audio or robotics equipment. This describes access requirements, not verified readiness on our Spark.

Simulator; open robot platform; camera/telemetry.

Before a full run

Feasibility=HARDWARE; priority=P2. Before confirmatory execution, run a small pilot to estimate variance/cost, freeze the scoring rules, and assign a run-count target.

Model revisions, final prompts, sample sizes, cost limits, and scoring rules must be settled through the pilot and protocol-freeze process.

03 / INTERPRETATION

What could fool us

Sim/real mismatch, sensor drift, uncontrolled physical environment.

What would weaken the idea

If sim policies fail systematically outside trivial tasks, transfer claims narrow.

Observation, inference, speculation, unknowns, and apparatus errors will be labeled separately. One striking transcript cannot establish a general effect.

04 / RECORD

Evidence we plan to preserve

Simulation seed, robot telemetry, video, action log, safety stops, environment state.

Planned visual evidence

Sim-vs-real trajectory overlay; error heatmap.

No research runs or raw datasets are published for this experiment. The September 26, 2026 registry and protocol compendium (version 1.0) are the sources for this planning record.

Back to all 90 experiments